Electronic system for measurement of radiation-sensitive mos devices

ABSTRACT

A low-power wireless ionizing radiation measurement system is present that is intended to be used in a wearable dosimeter for occupational radiation monitoring. An apparatus is provided comprising a switching interface, wherein the switching interface alternates between a first switching state and a second switching state. In the first switching state, a radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitor (MOSCAP) is coupled to an external biasing source. In the second switching state, the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP is coupled with reversed polarity relative to the first switching state to a capacitive readout circuit to thereby allow for high-resolution real-time electronic measurement of a radiation-induced capacitance response.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/065,087 to Valentino, et al., entitled, “MOS CAPACITOR-BASED, ACCUMULATING, RADIATION-SENSITIVE DETECTOR FOR OCCUPATIONAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND MEDICAL DOSIMETRY,” filed Oct. 17, 2014 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to radiation dosimetry and, more specifically, to high-sensitivity semiconductor-based radiation dose detectors for occupational, environmental and medical dosimetry.

2. Related Art

Most countries require that employees who work with sources of ionizing radiation be monitored by a government-accredited program. Occupation dosimetry, as it is called, covers millions of radiation workers in healthcare, mining, the nuclear power industry, etc., and is designed to monitor the short and long-term exposure of such workers to potentially-harmful doses of ionizing radiation. Typical exposures range from 0.1 mSv to 50 mSv (or 0.01 Rem to 5 Rem). The maximum permissible dose (MPD) to the body (the whole-body dose) allowed for radiation workers in the United States is 50 mSv per year. This needs to be measured above the background radiation (average of about 3 mSv per year) that the user receives to determine the occupational dose. Dosimeters can be active or passive. Active detectors are used to detect accidentally high exposures in a short period of time, and to provide warning to the radiation worker. Passive detectors are used to monitor the total dose (or dose of record) over a fixed period of time. In the majority of applications involving lower levels of radiation, passive dosimetry is preferable. These passive dosimeters are worn on the radiation worker, and are returned to the monitoring company every 1-3 months to measure the accumulated dose.

While this practice is very common, it is not ideal for several reasons. If a large dose is recorded, it is unknown when in the several-month time period the radiation worker may have received it, or the location where the dose was received. The dose rate is also unknown (e.g., one large dose at an instant, or continuous small doses over the monitored period), which may have a significant biological effect. The worker may also not know for a substantial amount of time after the dose was received, limiting the possibility of preventative measures or treatment. It is also unknown if a worker was actually wearing the badge at the time of the exposure. Finally, there is no way to tell if the badge was even worn by the assigned user.

Ideally, a dosimetry system would be able to read the dose significantly more often (e.g., at least once per day or on-demand), would transmit this data wirelessly (e.g., to a base station or cellular phone), would provide acceleration data to determine that the badge was worn (and, potentially, determine who was wearing the badge, for example, based on user gait), and would consume little power, such that a battery can last several years (potentially aided by one or more energy harvesters), and a base station or a GPS receiver in a cell phone could provide specific location details. Additionally, it is desirable for the sensing element to continue to accumulate dose when power is cut off.

SUMMARY

The foregoing needs are met, to a great extent, by the present invention wherein, according to a first broad aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus comprising a switching interface, wherein the switching interface alternates between a first switching state and a second switching state, wherein in the first switching state, a radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitor (MOSCAP) is coupled to an external biasing source, wherein in the second switching state, the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP is coupled with reversed polarity relative to the first switching state to a capacitive readout circuit to thereby allow for high-resolution real-time electronic measurement of a radiation-induced capacitance response.

According to a second broad aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus comprising one or more radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitors (MOSCAPs) configured to generate a radiation-induced capacitance response. The apparatus may comprise an external biasing source configured to increase sensitivity of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs. A capacitive readout circuit may be configured for high-resolution, real-time electronic measurement of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs. A switching interface may be configured to alternate between a first switching state and a second switching state, wherein in the first switching state, a radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitor (MOSCAP) is coupled to an external biasing source, wherein in the second switching state, the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP is coupled with reversed polarity relative to the first switching state to a capacitive readout circuit to thereby allow for high-resolution real-time electronic measurement of the radiation-induced capacitance response.

According to a third broad aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus comprising one or more radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitors (MOSCAPs) configured to generate a radiation-induced capacitance response. The apparatus may comprise an external biasing source configured to increase sensitivity of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs. A capacitive readout circuit may be configured for high-resolution, real-time electronic measurement of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs. A switching interface may be configured to alternate between a first switching state and a second switching state, wherein in the first switching state, a radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitor (MOSCAP) is coupled to an external biasing source, wherein in the second switching state, the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP is coupled with reversed polarity relative to the first switching state to a capacitive readout circuit to thereby allow for high-resolution real-time electronic measurement of the radiation-induced capacitance response. The apparatus may also comprise a microprocessor/wireless transceiver integrated-circuit (IC) for processing, storage and transmission of an output of the capacitive readout circuit to a base station for further signal processing and reporting.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the features of the invention.

FIG. 1 illustrates a basic structure of a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP showing the electrostatic condition of the device in both an unbiased and externally biased state, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is an illustration of the C-V response of a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP as a function an external bias applied across the radiation-sensitive oxide layer, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the radiation-induced capacitance response of a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP represented by a shift in the C-V response of the device, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is an illustration depicting the fraction of un-recombined holes as a function of the external bias voltage, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is an illustration of the sensitivity of the radiation-induced capacitance response, associated with a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP, as a function of applied external bias voltage, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the radiation sensitivity of a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP represented as the amount of radiation-induced shift in the device threshold voltage parameter as a function of the POA temperature, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the radiation-induced capacitance response sensitivity as a function of the POA temperature for three different values of external bias voltage applied across the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating the radiation-induced capacitance response sensitivity as a function of the external bias applied across the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP, measured for three different values of POA time parameter, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 9 is an illustration of the radiation-induced shift in the threshold voltage parameter as a function of the oxide layer thickness in a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is an illustration of the C-V response as a function of applied bias voltage for radiation-sensitive MOSCAP for varying oxide layer thickness values ranging from 200 nm to 1440 nm, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the rate of change of radiation-induced capacitance response as a function of oxide layer thickness, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 12 is an illustration of the radiation-induced capacitance response sensitivity for a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP as a function of the applied bias measured for different thickness values of the oxide layer, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 13 is diagram illustrating the main functional units in a solid-state MOSCAP-based dosimeter system with real-time wireless radiation-dose reporting capability, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a graph illustrating the distinction between the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP pre-radiation and post-radiation C-V response highlighting the operating regions, for an exemplary p-substrate implemented MOSCAP, during biasing operation and measurement operation required to maximize sensitivity, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 15 is an illustration of the optimal capacitance-voltage response of an exemplary p-substrate implemented radiation-sensitive MOSCAP during capacitance measurement operation, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 16 is a schematic illustrating different configurations of the active biasing switch for maintaining appropriate connectivity from capacitive readout IC and external bias source to the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 17 is a basic block diagram illustration of an active biasing switch for coupling the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP alternately to the biasing and measurement nodes, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 18 is an illustration of an exemplary capacitance measurement and readout SoC comprising a Capacitance to Digital Converter IC, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 19 illustrates an exemplary discharge-time based capacitance measurement schematic, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 20 illustrates an exemplary measurement block, represented by one or more voltage waveforms corresponding to charging and discharging of one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs, during a single measurement cycle, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 21 is an illustration of two different radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs capacitance responses to a radiation exposure profile comprised of 5000 mRad dose levels, measured in inversion and depletion operation regions.

FIG. 22 is an illustration of four different radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs capacitance responses to a radiation exposure profile comprised of 1000 mRad and 100 mRad dose levels, measured in inversion and depletion operation regions.

FIG. 23 is an illustration of four different radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs capacitance responses to a radiation exposure profile comprised of 100 mRad dose levels, measured in inversion and depletion operation regions.

FIG. 24 is an illustration of four different radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs capacitance responses to a radiation exposure profile comprised of 50 mRad dose levels, measured in inversion and depletion operation regions.

FIG. 25 is oscilloscope screen capture illustrating a single charge discharge cycle for a MOSCAP connected to PCAP01 IC, highlighting the Vdd and Vth voltage levels and the duration of the discharge time.

FIG. 26 is histogram illustration of differences in successive capacitance measurements made by PCAP01 IC.

FIG. 27 is an illustration of an exemplary microprocessor/wireless transceiver integrated circuit (IC) utilized for storage, processing and wireless transmission of radiation-sensitive MOSCAP sensor data, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 28 is a CAD image of the front-end sensing/processing unit of the solid-state dosimeter system, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 29 illustrates exemplary applications of wearable devices, according to embodiments of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Definitions

Where the definition of terms departs from the commonly used meaning of the term, applicant intends to utilize the definitions provided below, unless specifically indicated.

For purposes of the present invention, it should be noted that the singular forms, “a,” “an” and “the,” include reference to the plural unless the context as herein presented clearly indicates otherwise.

For purposes of the present invention, directional terms such as “top,” “bottom,” “upper,” “lower,” “above,” “below,” “left,” “right,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “up,” “down,” etc., are used merely for convenience in describing the various embodiments of the present invention. The embodiments of the present invention may be oriented in various ways. For example, the diagrams, apparatuses, etc., shown in the drawing figures may be flipped over, rotated by 90° in any direction, reversed, etc.

For purposes of the present invention, a value or property is “based” on a particular value, property, the satisfaction of a condition or other factor if that value is derived by performing a mathematical calculation or logical operation using that value, property or other factor.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “associated” with respect to data refers to data that are associated or linked to each other. For example, data relating the identity of an individual (identity data) wearing an integrated sensor module may be associated with the motion data for the individual obtained from an accelerometer or, optionally, from a gyroscope or, optionally, from the amplitude of the power signal from an energy harvester.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “base station” refers to any device or system with one or more serial interfaces capable of translating a protocol from one wireless communications protocol to another wireless or wired protocol. One example of a base station is a device capable of enabling a device or network that uses the Bluetooth® wireless protocol to communicate with a device or network that uses wireless or wired Ethernet protocols. Additional examples of base stations include: a dedicated external device that can act as a protocol translator between Bluetooth® devices and Ethernet devices, a cell phone configured to communicate with Bluetooth® devices and with a dedicated cell phone app that can perform the protocol translations, a Bluetooth® transceiver in a computer configured to communicate with Bluetooth® devices that uses a dedicated computer software application that can perform the protocol translations, etc. A base station may be a peripheral device such as a workstation, laptop, tablet computer, desktop computer, etc.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “Bluetooth®” refers to a wireless technology standard for exchanging data over short distances (using short-wavelength radio transmissions in the ISM band from 2400-2480 MHz) from fixed and mobile devices, creating personal area networks (PANs) with high levels of security. Created by telecom vendor Ericsson in 1994, it was originally conceived as a wireless alternative to RS-232 data cables. It can connect several devices, overcoming problems of synchronization. Bluetooth® is managed by the Bluetooth® Special Interest Group, which has more than 18,000 member companies in the areas of telecommunication, computing, networking, and consumer electronics. Bluetooth® was standardized as IEEE 802.15.1, but the standard is no longer maintained. The SIG oversees the development of the specification, manages the qualification program, and protects the trademarks. To be marketed as a Bluetooth® device, it must be qualified to standards defined by the SIG. A network of patents is required to implement the technology and is licensed only for those qualifying devices.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “characteristic capacitance-voltage curve” or “CV curve” or “capacitance response” refers to the change in capacitance as a function of the voltage applied at the gate, and is characteristic of a particular device. For purposes of the present invention, the term “capacitance to digital converter” refers to an electronic component, circuit or system configured to produce a digital signal representation of a capacitance parameter.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “capacitive readout circuit” refers to an electronic component, circuit or system configured to electronically measure and represents the capacitance parameter in form of an electrical signal.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “capacitive readout circuit” refers to an electronic component, circuit or system configured to electronically measure and represents the capacitance parameter in form of an electrical signal.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “cloud computing” is synonymous with computing performed by computers that are located remotely and accessed via the Internet (the “Cloud”). It is a style of computing where the computing resources are provided “as a service” so that users can access technology-enabled services “in the cloud” without knowledge of, expertise with, or control over the technology infrastructure that supports them. According to the IEEE Computer Society it “is a paradigm in which information is permanently stored in servers on the Internet and cached temporarily on clients that include desktops, entertainment centers, table computers, notebooks, wall computers, handhelds, etc.” Cloud computing is a general concept that incorporates virtualized storage, computing and web services and, often, software as a service (SaaS), where the common theme is reliance on the Internet for satisfying the computing needs of the users. For example, Google Apps provides common business applications online that are accessed from a web browser, while the software and data are stored on the servers. Some successful cloud architectures may have little or no established infrastructure or billing systems whatsoever including Peer-to-peer networks like BitTorrent and Skype and volunteer computing like SETI@home. The majority of cloud computing infrastructure currently consists of reliable services delivered through next-generation data centers that are built on computer and storage virtualization technologies. The services may be accessible anywhere in the world, with the Cloud appearing as a single point of access for all the computing needs of data consumers. Commercial offerings may need to meet the quality of service requirements of customers and may offer service level agreements. Open standards and open source software are also critical to the growth of cloud computing. As customers generally do not own the infrastructure they are merely accessing or renting, they may forego capital expenditure and consume resources as a service, paying instead for what they use. Many cloud computing offerings have adopted the utility computing model which is analogous to how traditional utilities like electricity are consumed, while others are billed on a subscription basis. By sharing “perishable and intangible” computing power between multiple tenants, utilization rates may be improved (as servers are not left idle) which can reduce costs significantly while increasing the speed of application development. A side effect of this approach is that “computer capacity rises dramatically” as customers may not have to engineer for peak loads. Adoption has been enabled by “increased high-speed bandwidth” which makes it possible to receive the same response times from centralized infrastructure at other sites.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “computer hardware” and the term “hardware” refer to the digital circuitry and physical devices of a computer system, as opposed to computer software, which is stored on a hardware device such as a hard disk. Computer hardware is not always seen by normal users because it is embedded within a variety of every day systems, such as in automobiles, microwave ovens, electrocardiograph machines, compact disc players, and video games, among many others. On the other hand, a “personal computer” seen by an “end user” typically consists of a case or chassis in a tower shape (desktop) and the following parts: motherboard, CPU, RAM, firmware, internal buses (PIC, PCI-E, USB, HyperTransport, CSI, AGP, VLB), external bus controllers (parallel port, serial port, USB, Firewire, SCSI. PS/2, ISA, EISA, MCA), power supply, case control with cooling fan, storage controllers (CD-ROM, DVD, DVD-ROM, DVD Writer, DVD RAM Drive, Blu-ray, BD-ROM, BD Writer, floppy disk, USB Flash, tape drives, SATA, SAS), video controller, sound card, network controllers (modem, NIC), and peripherals, including mice, keyboards, pointing devices, gaming devices, scanner, webcam, audio devices, printers, monitors, etc.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “computer network” refers to a group of interconnected computers. Networks may be classified according to a wide variety of characteristics. The most common types of computer networks in order of scale include: Personal Area Network (PAN), Local Area Network (LAN), Campus Area Network (CAN), Metropolitan Area Network (MAN), Wide Area Network (WAN), Global Area Network (GAN), Internetwork (intranet, extranet, Internet), and various types of wireless networks. All networks are made up of basic hardware building blocks to interconnect network nodes, such as Network Interface Cards (NICs), Bridges, Hubs, Switches, and Routers. In addition, some method of connecting these building blocks is required, usually in the form of galvanic cable (most commonly category 5 cable). Less common are microwave links (as in IEEE 802.11) or optical cable (“optical fiber”).

For purposes of the present invention, the term “computer software” and the term “software” refers to one or more computer programs, procedures and documentation that perform some tasks on a computer system. The term includes application software such as word processors which perform productive tasks for users, system software such as operating systems, which interface with hardware to provide the necessary services for application software, and middleware which controls and co-ordinates distributed systems. Software may include websites, programs, video games, etc. that are coded by programming languages like C, C++, Java, etc. Computer software is usually regarded as anything but hardware, meaning the “hard” are the parts that are tangible (able to hold) while the “soft” part is the intangible objects inside the computer. Computer software is so called to distinguish it from computer hardware, which encompasses the physical interconnections and devices required to store and execute (or run) the software. At the lowest level, software consists of a machine language specific to an individual processor. A machine language consists of groups of binary values signifying processor instructions which change the state of the computer from its preceding state.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “computer system” refers to any type of computer system that implements software including an individual computer such as a personal computer, mainframe computer, mini-computer, etc. In addition, computer system refers to any type of network of computers, such as a network of computers in a business, the Internet, personal data assistant (PDA), devices such as a cell phone, a television, a videogame console, a compressed audio or video player such as an MP3 player, a DVD player, a microwave oven, etc. A personal computer is one type of computer system that typically includes the following components: a case or chassis in a tower shape (desktop) and the following parts: motherboard, CPU, RAM, firmware, internal buses (PIC, PCI-E, USB, HyperTransport, CSI, AGP, VLB), external bus controllers (parallel port, serial port, USB, Firewire, SCSI. PS/2, ISA, EISA, MCA), power supply, case control with cooling fan, storage controllers (CD-ROM, DVD, DVD-ROM, DVD Writer, DVD RAM Drive, Blu-ray, BD-ROM, BD Writer, floppy disk, USB Flash, tape drives, SATA, SAS), video controller, sound card, network controllers (modem, NIC), and peripherals, including mice, keyboards, pointing devices, gaming devices, scanner, webcam, audio devices, printers, monitors, etc.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “computer” refers to any type of computer or other device that implements software including an individual computer such as a personal computer, laptop computer, tablet computer, mainframe computer, mini-computer, etc. A computer also refers to electronic devices such as an electronic scientific instrument such as a spectrometer, a smartphone, an eBook reader, a cell phone, a television, a handheld electronic game console, a videogame console, a compressed audio or video player such as an MP3 player, a Blu-ray player, a DVD player, etc. In addition, the term “computer” refers to any type of network of computers, such as a network of computers in a business, a computer bank, the Cloud, the Internet, etc. Various processes of the present invention may be carried out using a computer. Various functions of the present invention may be performed by one or more computers.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “coupled” refers to a condition of being directly or indirectly connected.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “coupled” refers to a condition of being directly or indirectly connected.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “data storage medium” or “data storage device” refers to any medium or media on which a data may be stored for use by a computer system. Examples of data storage media include floppy disks, Zip™ disks, CD-ROM, CD-R, CD-RW, DVD, DVD-R, memory sticks, flash memory, hard disks, solid state disks, optical disks, etc. Two or more data storage media acting similarly to a single data storage medium may be referred to as a “data storage medium” For purposes of the present invention. A data storage medium may be part of a computer.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “data” means the reinterpretable representation of information in a formalized manner suitable for communication, interpretation, or processing. Although one type of common type data is a computer file, data may also be streaming data, a web service, etc. The term “data” is used to refer to one or more pieces of data.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “database” or “data record” refers to a structured collection of records or data that is stored in a computer system. The structure is achieved by organizing the data according to a database model. The model in most common use today is the relational model. Other models such as the hierarchical model and the network model use a more explicit representation of relationships (see below for explanation of the various database models). A computer database relies upon software to organize the storage of data. This software is known as a database management system (DBMS). Database management systems are categorized according to the database model that they support. The model tends to determine the query languages that are available to access the database. A great deal of the internal engineering of a DBMS, however, is independent of the data model, and is concerned with managing factors such as performance, concurrency, integrity, and recovery from hardware failures. In these areas there are large differences between products.

For the purposes of the present invention, the term “depletion operation regime,” “depletion region of operation,” “depletion operating region,” “depletion region,” “operate in depletion,” “operating in depletion” or “depletion operation region” may be used interchangeably to refer to an operational mode, condition, state or phenomena and attributes or characteristics resulting therefrom, wherein an insulating region, from which the mobile charge carriers have diffused away or have been forced away by an electric field, is formed within a conductive, doped semiconductor material. The only elements left in the insulating region, also referred to as a “depletion region,” are ionized donor or acceptor impurities. The depletion region is so named, because it is formed from a conducting doped semiconductor region by removal of all free charge carriers, leaving none to carry a current.

For the purposes of the present invention, the term “electronically measurable” refers to a physical, chemical or optical quantity that may be accurately represented as an electrical parameter such as capacitance, resistance, current or voltage and hence detected and quantified with one or more electronic components, devices, circuits or systems.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “hardware and/or software” refers to functions that may be performed by digital software, digital hardware, or a combination of both digital hardware and digital software. Various features of the present invention may be performed by hardware and/or software.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “individual” refers to an individual mammal, such as a human being.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “Internet protocol (IP)” refers to a protocol used for communicating data across a packet-switched internetwork using the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP). IP is the primary protocol in the Internet Layer of the Internet Protocol Suite and has the task of delivering datagrams (packets) from the source host to the destination host solely based on its address. For this purpose the Internet Protocol defines addressing methods and structures for datagram encapsulation. The first major version of addressing structure, now referred to as Internet Protocol Version 4 (Ipv4) is still the dominant protocol of the Internet, although the successor, Internet Protocol Version 6 (Ipv6) is actively deployed world-wide. In one embodiment, an EGI-SOA of the present invention may be specifically designed to seamlessly implement both of these protocols.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “Internet” is a global system of interconnected computer networks that interchange data by packet switching using the standardized Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP). It is a “network of networks” that consists of millions of private and public, academic, business, and government networks of local to global scope that are linked by copper wires, fiber-optic cables, wireless connections, and other technologies. The Internet carries various information resources and services, such as electronic mail, online chat, file transfer and file sharing, online gaming, and the inter-linked hypertext documents and other resources of the World Wide Web (WWW).

For purposes of the present invention, the term “intranet” refers to a set of networks, using the Internet Protocol and IP-based tools such as web browsers and file transfer applications that are under the control of a single administrative entity. That administrative entity closes the intranet to all but specific, authorized users. Most commonly, an intranet is the internal network of an organization. A large intranet will typically have at least one web server to provide users with organizational information. Intranets may or may not have connections to the Internet. If connected to the Internet, the intranet is normally protected from being accessed from the Internet without proper authorization. The Internet is not considered to be a part of the intranet.

For the purposes of the present invention, the term “inversion region of operation,” “inversion operating region,” “inversion region,” “operate in inversion,” “operating in inversion,” or “inversion operation regime” may be used interchangeably to refer to an operational mode, condition, state or phenomena and attributes or characteristics resulting therefrom, wherein a voltage applied across a metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) device, i.e., voltage drop magnitude across the insulating layer of MOS capacitor, is greater than the magnitude of the threshold voltage associated with the MOS device, such that the induced electric field penetrates through the insulating layer (i.e. the oxide layer) and inverts the polarity of the semiconductor material disposed at or near the oxide-semiconductor interface. In other words, as a result of an applied voltage drop magnitude across a MOS device, such as a MOS capacitor (MOSCAP), in excess of the threshold voltage magnitude associated with the MOS device (i.e. MOS capacitor) the semiconductor material near the oxide-semiconductor interface, i.e., near the silicon/silicon dioxide (Si/SiO₂) interface, becomes inverted and, for example, starts acting like n-type silicon in a p-type substrate or a p-type silicon in an n-type substrate. This means that minority charges (i.e., electrons in a p-type substrate and holes in an n-type substrate) form in the substrate at or near the semiconductor-oxide interface as a result of the applied voltage drop magnitude across the MOS device. As the applied voltage drop magnitude is further increased passed the threshold voltage magnitude, due to an exponential increase in the concentration of charge carriers in the inversion layer in response thereof, the depletion layer width barely increases further (depletion capacitance barely reduces further) with increasing applied voltage magnitude.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “local area network (LAN)” refers to a network covering a small geographic area, like a home, office, or building. Current LANs are most likely to be based on Ethernet technology. The cables to the servers are typically on Cat 5e enhanced cable, which will support IEEE 802.3 at 1 Gbit/s. A wireless LAN may exist using a different IEEE protocol, 802.11b, 802.11g or possibly 802.11n. The defining characteristics of LANs, in contrast to WANs (wide area networks), include their higher data transfer rates, smaller geographic range, and lack of a need for leased telecommunication lines. Current Ethernet or other IEEE 802.3 LAN technologies operate at speeds up to 10 Gbit/s.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “low powered wireless network” refers to an ultra-low powered wireless network between sensor nodes and a centralized device. The ultra-low power is needed by devices that need to operate for extended periods of time from small batteries energy scavenging technology. Examples of low powered wireless networks are ANT, ANT+, Bluetooth®, Low Energy (BLE), ZigBee and WiFi.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “machine-readable medium” refers to any tangible or non-transitory medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present invention, or that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying data structures utilized by or associated with such instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” includes, but is limited to, solid-state memories, and optical and magnetic media. Specific examples of machine-readable media include non-volatile memory, including by way of example, semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The term “machine-readable medium” may include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more instructions or data structures.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “MEMS” refers to Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems. MEMS, is a technology that in its most general form may be defined as miniaturized mechanical and electro-mechanical elements (i.e., devices and structures) that are made using the techniques of microfabrication. The critical physical dimensions of MEMS devices can vary from well below one micron on the lower end of the dimensional spectrum, all the way to several millimeters. Likewise, the types of MEMS devices can vary from relatively simple structures having no moving elements, to extremely complex electromechanical systems with multiple moving elements under the control of integrated microelectronics. A main criterion of MEMS may include that there are at least some elements having some sort of mechanical functionality whether or not these elements can move. The term used to define MEMS varies in different parts of the world. In the United States they are predominantly called MEMS, while in some other parts of the world they are called “Microsystems Technology” or “micromachined devices.” While the functional elements of MEMS are miniaturized structures, sensors, actuators, and microelectronics, most notable elements may include microsensors and microactuators. Microsensors and microactuators may be appropriately categorized as “transducers,” which are defined as devices that convert energy from one form to another. In the case of microsensors, the device typically converts a measured mechanical signal into an electrical signal.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “mesh networking” refers to a type of networking where each node must not only capture and disseminate its own data, but also serve as a relay for other nodes, that is, it must collaborate to propagate the data in the network. A mesh network can be designed using a flooding technique or a routing technique. When using a routing technique, the message is propagated along a path, by hopping from node to node until the destination is reached. To ensure all its paths' availability, a routing network must allow for continuous connections and reconfiguration around broken or blocked paths, using self-healing algorithms. A mesh network whose nodes are all connected to each other is a fully connected network. Mesh networks can be seen as one type of ad hoc network. Mobile ad hoc networks and mesh networks are therefore closely related, but mobile ad hoc networks also have to deal with the problems introduced by the mobility of the nodes. The self-healing capability enables a routing based network to operate when one node breaks down or a connection goes bad. As a result, the network is typically quite reliable, as there is often more than one path between a source and a destination in the network. Although mostly used in wireless situations, this concept is also applicable to wired networks and software interaction.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “mobile ad hoc network” is a self-configuring network of mobile devices connected by wireless. Ad hoc is Latin and means “for this purpose”. Each device in a mobile ad hoc network is free to move independently in any direction, and will therefore change its links to other devices frequently. Each must forward traffic unrelated to its own use, and therefore be a router. The primary challenge in building a mobile ad hoc network is equipping each device to continuously maintain the information required to properly route traffic. Such networks may operate by themselves or may be connected to the larger Internet. Mobile ad hoc networks are a kind of wireless ad hoc networks that usually has a routable networking environment on top of a Link Layer ad hoc network. The growths of laptops and wireless networks have made mobile ad hoc networks a popular research topic since the mid-1990s. Many academic papers evaluate protocols and their abilities, assuming varying degrees of mobility within a bounded space, usually with all nodes within a few hops of each other. Different protocols are then evaluated based on measure such as the packet drop rate, the overhead introduced by the routing protocol, end-to-end packet delays, network throughput etc.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “network hub” refers to an electronic device that contains multiple ports. When a packet arrives at one port, it is copied to all the ports of the hub for transmission. When the packets are copied, the destination address in the frame does not change to a broadcast address. It does this in a rudimentary way, it simply copies the data to all of the Nodes connected to the hub. This term is also known as hub. The term “Ethernet hub,” “active hub,” “network hub,” “repeater hub,” “multiport repeater” or “hub” may also refer to a device for connecting multiple Ethernet devices together and making them act as a single network segment. It has multiple input/output (I/O) ports, in which a signal introduced at the input of any port appears at the output of every port except the original incoming. A hub works at the physical layer (layer 1) of the OSI model. The device is a form of multiport repeater. Repeater hubs also participate in collision detection, forwarding a jam signal to all ports if it detects a collision.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “non-transient storage medium” refers to a storage medium that is non-transitory, tangible and computer readable. Non-transient storage medium may refer generally to any durable medium known in the art upon which data can be stored and later retrieved by data processing circuitry operably coupled with the medium. A non-limiting non-exclusive list of exemplary non-transitory data storage media may include magnetic data storage media (e.g., hard disc, data tape, etc.), solid state semiconductor data storage media (e.g., SDRAM, flash memory, ROM, etc.), and optical data storage media (e.g., compact optical disc, DVD, etc.).

For purposes of the present invention, the term “processor” refers to a device that performs the basic operations in a computer. A microprocessor is one example of a processor

For purposes of the present invention, the term “radiation sensitive” refers to the condition of exhibiting an alteration in one or more intrinsic/extrinsic parameters.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “radiation-induced capacitance response” refers to an alteration in the capacitance parameter in response to exposure to radiation or as a result of interaction with radiation.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “radiation-sensitive oxide layer” refers to alteration in electric field within oxide layer in response to the absorption of radiation that incident upon the oxide layer.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “radiation-sensitive oxide layer” refers to a MOSCAP that produces a response in terms of a shift in threshold voltage and/or capacitance parameter.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “radiation-sensitive oxide layer” refers to an increase in the number of available hole traps in the oxide layer.

For the purposes of the present invention, the term “radiation-sensitive oxide layer” refers to the oxide layer of the MOS structure of a MOSCAP detector that was fabricated to increase the number of available hole traps in the oxide layer such that the MOSCAP detector has increased sensitivity to radiation.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “random-access memory (RAM)” refers to a type of computer data storage. Today it takes the form of integrated circuits that allow the stored data to be accessed in any order, i.e. at random. The word random thus refers to the fact that any piece of data can be returned in a constant time, regardless of its physical location and whether or not it is related to the previous piece of data. This contrasts with storage mechanisms such as tapes, magnetic discs and optical discs, which rely on the physical movement of the recording medium or a reading head. In these devices, the movement takes longer than the data transfer, and the retrieval time varies depending on the physical location of the next item. The word RAM is mostly associated with volatile types of memory (such as DRAM memory modules), where the information is lost after the power is switched off. However, many other types of memory are RAM as well, including most types of ROM and a kind of flash memory called NOR-Flash.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “read-only memory (ROM)” refers to a class of storage media used in computers and other electronic devices. Because data stored in ROM cannot be modified (at least not very quickly or easily), it is mainly used to distribute firmware (software that is very closely tied to specific hardware, and unlikely to require frequent updates). In its strictest sense, ROM refers only to mask ROM (the oldest type of solid state ROM), which is fabricated with the desired data permanently stored in it, and thus can never be modified. However, more modern types such as EPROM and flash EEPROM can be erased and re-programmed multiple times; they are still described as “read-only memory” because the reprogramming process is generally infrequent, comparatively slow, and often does not permit random access writes to individual memory locations.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “real-time processing” refers to a processing system designed to handle workloads whose state is constantly changing. Real-time processing means that a transaction is processed fast enough for the result to come back and be acted on as transaction events are generated. In the context of a database, real-time databases are databases that are capable of yielding reliable responses in real-time. For purposes of the present invention, the term “router” refers to a networking device that forwards data packets between networks using headers and forwarding tables to determine the best path to forward the packets. Routers work at the network layer of the TCP/IP model or layer 3 of the OSI model. Routers also provide interconnectivity between like and unlike media devices. A router is connected to at least two networks, commonly two LANs or WANs or a LAN and its ISP's network.

For the purposes of the present invention, the term “received radiation dose” and “absorbed radiation dose” are used interchangeably to refer to radiation dose to which a radiation sensor, such as, for example, a MOSCAP or a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP, has been exposed or radiation dose that is incident upon a radiation sensor, such as, a MOSCAP or a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “server” refers to a system (software and suitable computer hardware) that responds to requests across a computer network to provide, or help to provide, a network service. Servers can be run on a dedicated computer, which is also often referred to as “the server,” but many networked computers are capable of hosting servers. In many cases, a computer can provide several services and have several servers running Servers may operate within a client-server architecture and may comprise computer programs running to serve the requests of other programs—the clients. Thus, the server may perform some task on behalf of clients. The clients typically connect to the server through the network but may run on the same computer. In the context of Internet Protocol (IP) networking, a server is a program that operates as a socket listener. Servers often provide essential services across a network, either to private users inside a large organization or to public users via the Internet. Typical computing servers are database server, file server, mail server, print server, web server, gaming server, application server, or some other kind of server. Numerous systems use this client/server networking model including Web sites and email services. An alternative model, peer-to-peer networking may enable all computers to act as either a server or client as needed.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “solid state sensor” refers to sensor built entirely from a solid-phase material such that the electrons or other charge carriers produced in response to the measured quantity stay entirely with the solid volume of the detector, as opposed to gas-discharge or electro-mechanical sensors. Pure solid-state sensors have no mobile parts and are distinct from electro-mechanical transducers or actuators in which mechanical motion is created proportional to the measured quantity.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “solid-state electronics” refers to those circuits or devices built entirely from solid materials and in which the electrons, or other charge carriers, are confined entirely within the solid material. The term is often used to contrast with the earlier technologies of vacuum and gas-discharge tube devices and it is also conventional to exclude electro-mechanical devices (relays, switches, hard drives and other devices with moving parts) from the term solid state. While solid-state can include crystalline, polycrystalline and amorphous solids and refer to electrical conductors, insulators and semiconductors, the building material is most often a crystalline semiconductor. Common solid-state devices include transistors, microprocessor chips, and RAM. A specialized type of RAM called flash RAM is used in flash drives and more recently, solid state drives to replace mechanically rotating magnetic disc hard drives. More recently, the integrated circuit (IC), the light-emitting diode (LED), and the liquid-crystal display (LCD) have evolved as further examples of solid-state devices. In a solid-state component, the current is confined to solid elements and compounds engineered specifically to switch and amplify it.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “storage medium” refers to any form of storage that may be used to store bits of information. Examples of storage include both volatile and non-volatile memories such as MRRAM, MRRAM, ERAM, flash memory, RFID tags, floppy disks, Zip™ disks, CD-ROM, CD-R, CD-RW, DVD, DVD-R, flash memory, hard disks, optical disks, etc. Two or more storage media acting similarly to a single data storage medium may be referred to as a “storage medium” For purposes of the present invention. A storage medium may be part of a computer.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “switchingly coupled” refers to a condition wherein coupling is established through a switch. Such that a closed switch corresponds to a coupled state, whereas an open switch corresponds to an uncoupled state.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “time” refers to a component of a measuring system used to sequence events, to compare the durations of events and the intervals between them, and to quantify the motions of objects. Time is considered one of the few fundamental quantities and is used to define quantities such as velocity. An operational definition of time, wherein one says that observing a certain number of repetitions of one or another standard cyclical event (such as the passage of a free-swinging pendulum) constitutes one standard unit such as the second, has a high utility value in the conduct of both advanced experiments and everyday affairs of life. Temporal measurement has occupied scientists and technologists, and was a prime motivation in navigation and astronomy. Periodic events and periodic motion have long served as standards for units of time. Examples include the apparent motion of the sun across the sky, the phases of the moon, the swing of a pendulum, and the beat of a heart. Currently, the international unit of time, the second, is defined in terms of radiation emitted by cesium atoms.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “timestamp” refers to a sequence of characters, denoting the date and/or time at which a certain event occurred. This data is usually presented in a consistent format, allowing for easy comparison of two different records and tracking progress over time; the practice of recording timestamps in a consistent manner along with the actual data is called timestamping. Timestamps are typically used for logging events, in which case each event in a log is marked with a timestamp. In file systems, timestamp may mean the stored date/time of creation or modification of a file. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has defined ISO 8601 which standardizes timestamps.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “transmission control protocol (TCP)” refers to one of the core protocols of the Internet Protocol Suite. TCP is so central that the entire suite is often referred to as “TCP/IP.” Whereas IP handles lower-level transmissions from computer to computer as a message makes its way across the Internet, TCP operates at a higher level, concerned only with the two end systems, for example a Web browser and a Web server. In particular, TCP provides reliable, ordered delivery of a stream of bytes from one program on one computer to another program on another computer. Besides the Web, other common applications of TCP include e-mail and file transfer. Among its management tasks, TCP controls message size, the rate at which messages are exchanged, and network traffic congestion.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “visual display device” or “visual display apparatus” includes any type of visual display device or apparatus such as a CRT monitor, LCD screen, LEDs, a projected display, a printer for printing out an image such as a picture and/or text, etc. A visual display device may be a part of another device such as a computer monitor, television, projector, telephone, cell phone, smartphone, laptop computer, tablet computer, handheld music and/or video player, personal data assistant (PDA), handheld game player, head mounted display, a heads-up display (HUD), a global positioning system (GPS) receiver, automotive navigation system, dashboard, watch, microwave oven, electronic organ, automatic teller machine (ATM) etc.

For the purposes of the present invention, the term “wearable device” refers to a device that may be mounted, fastened or attached to a user or any part of a user's clothing, or incorporated into items of clothing and accessories which may be worn on the body of a user. In some embodiments, wearable device refers to wearable technology, wearables, fashionable technology, tech togs, fashion electronics, clothing and accessories, such as badges, watches, and jewelry incorporating computer and advanced electronic technologies.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “web service” refers to the term defined by the W3C as “a software system designed to support interoperable machine-to-machine interaction over a network.” Web services are frequently just web APIs that can be accessed over a network, such as the Internet, and executed on a remote system hosting the requested services. The W3C Web service definition encompasses many different systems, but in common usage the term refers to clients and servers that communicate using XML messages that follow the SOAP standard. In such systems, there is often machine-readable description of the operations offered by the service written in the Web Services Description Language (WSDL). The latter is not a requirement of a SOAP endpoint, but it is a prerequisite for automated client-side code generation in many Java and .NET SOAP frameworks. Some industry organizations, such as the WS-I, mandate both SOAP and WSDL in their definition of a Web service. More recently, RESTful Web services have been used to better integrate with HTTP compared to SOAP-based services. They do not require XML messages or WSDL service-API definitions.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “wide area network (WAN)” refers to a data communications network that covers a relatively broad geographic area (i.e. one city to another and one country to another country) and that often uses transmission facilities provided by common carriers, such as telephone companies. WAN technologies generally function at the lower three layers of the OSI reference model: the physical layer, the data link layer, and the network layer.

For purposes of the present invention, the term “World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)” refers to the main international standards organization for the World Wide Web (abbreviated WWW or W3). It is arranged as a consortium where member organizations maintain full-time staff for the purpose of working together in the development of standards for the World Wide Web. W3C also engages in education and outreach, develops software and serves as an open forum for discussion about the Web. W3C standards include: CSS, CGI, DOM, GRDDL, HTML, OWL, RDF, SVG, SISR, SOAP, SMIL, SRGS, SSML, VoiceXML, XHTML+Voice, WSDL, XACML. XHTML, XML, XML Events, Xforms, XML Information, Set, XML Schema, Xpath, Xquery and XSLT.

DESCRIPTION

While the present invention is disclosed with references to certain embodiments, numerous modification, alterations, and changes to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the present invention, as defined in the appended claims. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but that it has the full scope defined by the language of the following claims, and equivalents thereof. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.

A conventional solution to solid-state dosimetry includes the metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) radiation dosimeter. When the MOSFET is exposed to ionizing radiation electron hole pairs are generated in the oxide insulation layer. The junction potential between the device layers, or an applied positive potential to the gate, causes the electrons (whose mobility in SiO₂ at room temperature is about four orders of magnitude greater than holes) to quickly move towards the positively biased contact while the holes migrate to the oxide-silicon interface where they are trapped. These trapped charges cause a shift in the threshold voltage, since a larger negative voltage must be applied to the gate to overcome the electric field of the trapped charges. The threshold voltage shift is proportional to the radiation dose deposited in the oxide layer and this relationship is the basis for using MOSFETs as dosimeters.

The formation of radiation-induced oxide fixed charges densities, as a result of ionizing radiation passing through the oxide layer of a MOSFET sensor, permanently shifts the device threshold voltage parameter. By detecting this change in threshold voltage with an electronic circuit, the dose received can be determined. Several of the shortcomings associated with MOSFET radiation sensors, as discussed above, is overcome by utilizing the capacitance change resulting from incident radiation instead of utilizing the threshold voltage shift (as in MOSFET radiation sensors) for representing the radiation response of a MOS Si/SiO₂ device. This is in part due to the high sensitivity and precision of capacitance measurement electronics that far exceeds that of voltage measurement circuitry. Disclosed embodiments utilize the capacitance measurement circuitry as among the most sensitive available and results in a lower minimum resolvable dose, thus making a metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) based capacitive radiation sensing system viable for occupational dosimetry applications, capable of precise real-time measurement and readout of sensor data hence, enabling continuous monitoring of absorbed radiation dose.

Additional limitations associated with the measurement and readout of a threshold voltage shift (in response to the radiation-induced build-up of an oxide trapped charge for estimating the absorbed dosage(s) of radiation(s)) includes the requirement of a wired readout circuit. Using the same principle of oxide-trapped charge build-up, but by monitoring the change in capacitance (instead of threshold voltage), a wireless dose sensor is disclosed in the present invention. The disclosed sensor element is a custom MOS capacitor (MOSCAP) which traps holes in proportion to the amount of ionizing radiation detected, thus permanently causing a lateral shift in the capacitance-voltage (C-V) response toward a more negative threshold voltage. A capacitive readout circuit, coupled to the output of one or more radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitors (MOSCAPs), measures the capacitance value of several redundant sensors at a given voltage in the depletion operation regime, records this value over time and occasionally transmits the stored values to a base station (i.e., any device or system with one or more serial interfaces capable, for example, of 2.4 Ghz communication, including peripheral devices such as workstations, laptops, tablet computers, desktop computers, etc.) via an on-board wireless transceiver integrated circuit (IC).

Constructing a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP sensor, according to disclosed embodiments, involves a structural alterations to the conventional MOSFET structure, namely removing the source and drain implants, making the gate electrode larger, and gate oxide thicker. The final structure is a MOS capacitor or MOSCAP. FIG. 1 illustrates a MOSCAP structure 100 in both unbiased configuration 101 and externally biased configuration 103. The MOSCAP structures 100 comprise a bottom conductive layer 102, a top conductive layer 104, and an insulating layer 106 sandwiched there in between. The bottom conductive layer 102 may comprise a silicon substrate and the top conductive layer 104 may comprise a polysilicon or metal layer. The insulting layer 106 may comprise a radiation-sensitive oxide layer. In one embodiment of the present invention the bottom conductive layer 102 may be produced from a p-type doped silicon substrate. In select embodiments of the present invention the radiation-sensitive oxide layer, corresponding to the insulating layer 106, may comprise a silicon dioxide layer (SiO₂). Since the top conductive layer 104 also acts as the gate of a MOS transistor, the top conductive layer 104 is also referred to as the gate electrode. Conducting contact 108 are made to the top conductive layer 104 and conducting contact 110 are made to the bottom conducting layer 102, in order to electrically connect the apparatus to other electronic devices. In one embodiment of the present invention the conducting contact may comprise a titanium/gold compound that may be bonded to pins of a gold-plated TO header package for external connectivity.

A key feature of the MOSCAP is its voltage dependent capacitance, which is a manifestation of the same material properties behind the switching behavior of MOSFETs. Therefore, it is possible to perform C-V characterization on the MOSCAP device in order to assess voltage-dependent capacitance response and voltage values delineating its discrete regions of operation in accordance to the response trace illustrated in FIG. 2. The physical picture of the MOSCAP is that, depending on the gate voltage, majority or minority charge carriers can fill silicon energy sub-bands at the substrate-Oxide (Si/SiO₂) interface due to band bending of the silicon conduction and valence bands; also, the bulk of the semiconductor can become depleted of the majority charge carriers. The depletion or accumulation of charges at the semiconductor interface is controlled by the gate voltage.

The maximum capacitance that the MOSCAP can attain is the oxide capacitance. The oxide capacitance is the capacitance that the device approaches for gate voltages less than the flatband voltage as illustrated in FIG. 2. The capacitance changes with voltage, because an insulating region that is depleted of charge carriers, forms in the semiconductor as the gate voltage is increased past the flatband voltage. Under accumulation conditions, the device capacitance is the same as the oxide capacitance. Since carriers can easily be moved to and from the interface, the charges build up at both sides of the oxide as in a parallel plate capacitor. This changes as the applied bias voltage (henceforth, referenced interchangeably as Gate voltage) becomes positive, thereby, creating a depletion layer in the semiconductor. This depletion layer prevents carriers from moving towards the semiconductor-oxide interface. The variation of the charge, therefore, occurs at the edge of the depletion region so that the measured capacitance is the series connection of the oxide capacitance and the depletion layer capacitance. The depletion region, forming a series capacitance with the oxide capacitance, varies inversely with the depth of the depletion layer. Since depletion width is dependent on the gate voltage, the semiconductor capacitance becomes dependent on the gate voltage. As the depletion width approaches zero, the total capacitance approaches the oxide capacitance. From the gate voltage dependent capacitance response curve in FIG. 2, it can also be seen that the capacitance reaches its minimum (depletion region reaches its maximum width) for applied bias voltages greater than the threshold voltage. This is the inversion operation region of the MOSCAP, referenced accordingly in FIG. 2. In this region the depletion layer width, hence, the MOSCAP capacitance, is almost independent of the applied bias voltage yielding a constant (and minimum) capacitance. The total capacitance can be obtained from a series connection of the oxide capacitance and the minimum capacitance of the depletion layer.

The interaction of semiconductor and insulating solids with radiation is understood as the creation of electron hole pairs (e-h) through ionization of individual atoms by primary and secondary particles. Subsequent to their creation, these charges can either recombine in the material, discharge through conduction, or become trapped. If charges are trapped and, therefore, present in the oxide, they too can change the semiconductor depletion region width in the same way the gate voltage can. Any increase in oxide charge density will affect the semiconductor depletion region width, which results in a capacitance change. Trapped positive charges create an electric field in the oxide, and appear as an added positive gate voltage. This results in an increasingly negative threshold voltage and a negative voltage shift in the C-V response curve of the MOSCAP device, as Illustrated in FIG. 3. Therefore the trapping of positive charges (holes) in the oxide layer created by the interaction of ionizing radiation and the oxide results in a radiation-induced capacitance response in the MOSCAP.

Following the radiation-induced electron-hole pair generation in the radiation-sensitive oxide layer of a MOSCAP sensor, the amount of initial recombination and hence annihilation of liberated charge is highly dependent on the electric field in the oxide and the energy and type of incident particle. In general, strongly ionizing particles form dense columns of charge where the recombination rate is relatively high. On the other hand, weakly ionizing particles generate relatively isolated charge pairs, and the recombination rate is lower.

The dependence of initial recombination on the electric field strength in the oxide for low-energy protons, alpha particles, gamma rays (Co-60), and x rays is illustrated in FIG. 4. Plotted in FIG. 4 is the fraction of un-recombined holes, also referred to as charge yield (liberated charges, as a result of absorbed radiation, that will actually contribute to the radiation response of the device) versus electric field in the oxide. For all radiation types, as the electric field strength increases, the probability that a hole will recombine with an electron decreases, and the fraction of un-recombined holes increases.

Disclosed embodiments provide application of an external bias across the MOSCAP device increases the strength of the electric field that accelerates the liberated hole and electron pairs in opposite direction, thus impeding their recombination at the site of radiation absorption within the oxide. This is illustrated for the radiation-sensitive externally biased MOSCAP structure in FIG. 1. The efficiency of positive charge collection at the substrate/oxide (Si/SiO₂) interface where majority of hole trapping sites reside will, therefore, increase in response to the applied positive bias across a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP resulting in a greater shift in capacitance in response to absorbed radiation. This results in an enhanced radiation-induced capacitance response sensitivity. Capacitance response sensitivity as a function of applied bias is illustrated in FIG. 5. According to measured data presented in FIG. 5, a base-line sensitivity of 1.1 fF/mrad is established with applied external bias of 5V, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

As discussed above, an absorbed radiation dose in the oxide layer of a MOS Si/SiO₂ device can more precisely be quantified by measurement of the change in the capacitance parameter in a MOSCAP device rather than the change in the threshold voltage parameter in a MOSFET device. The former yields significantly better resolution due to a greater precision of the available capacitance electronic measurement methodologies. Moreover, application of bias voltage across the radiation-sensitive oxide layer, in accordance with disclosed embodiments, can also increase the sensitivity of MOSCAP radiation response as illustrated in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5. Further enhancement of device radiation response sensitivity and resolution is achievable by controlling the device structural and process parameters. Three such parameters that can be selected to optimize the performance of the detector as a radiation dosimeter are the oxide thickness, the post-oxidation annealing time and temperature parameters.

The post-oxidation annealing (POA) temperature plays an important role in the buildup of oxygen vacancies, which is the primary type of defect responsible for oxide trapping of holes. This is attributed to the out-diffusion of oxygen at high temperatures, thus, leaving behind oxygen vacancy defects. High POA temperatures result in vacancies that lead to significantly increased radiation-induced oxide charge buildup.

In one embodiment, radiation-sensitive MOSCAP with enhanced radiation sensitivity are fabricated at POA temperature of 1100° C. and compared with a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP structures with base-line radiation sensitivity fabricated at a POA of 400° C. The high temperature POA is expected to create an excess of hole traps in the SiO₂. The increase in hole traps resulting from high temperature POA expectedly leads to greater deviation in a radiation-induced shift in a MOSCAP's capacitance parameter which is a real-time measure of the absorbed radiation dose in the MOSCAP's radiation-sensitive oxide layer. This information may be gathered and subsequently processed, for example, in a computer system for further analysis. For example, described embodiments may provide saving a value of the absorbed radiation dose, for example, to a non-transient storage medium and/or displaying the value of the absorbed radiation dose to a user. The enhanced sensitivity exhibited by MOSCAP devices fabricated at high POA temperatures, in accordance to one aspect of the present invention, is illustrated by the measured data in FIG. 6. This embodiment presents a factor of four increase in the radiation-induced threshold voltage shift when the temperature parameter associated with the POA fabrication step is increased from 800° C. to 950° C. Furthermore, a voltage shift increase of a factor of 20 is achieved by increasing the POA temperature from 800° C. to 1200° C.

FIG. 7 illustrates radiation sensitivity in terms of change in capacitance as a function of the POA temperature, measured for a unbiased radiation-sensitive MOSCAP, a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP biased at 5V and a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP biased at 10V. As expected, higher POA temperatures increase sensitivity of radiation-induced capacitance response in radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs.

FIG. 8 illustrates radiation sensitivity in terms of MOSCAP capacitance response measured as a function of the applied BIAS voltage at three different time parameters associated with the POA fabrication step. As observed from FIG. 8, longer POA times have a small effect on improving sensitivity, however above 200 minutes, the sensitivity starts to significantly decrease due to the reduction in the rate of change of MOSCAP capacitance with respect to the applied voltage. Therefore optimal results, in accordance to one aspect of the present invention, are associated with POA time parameters within a range of approximately 100-200 minutes.

In accordance to one aspect of the present invention, POA conducted at approximately 1100° C. for approximately 100 min in N2 results in near 100% trapping of the radiation-generated holes, increasing the radiation sensitivity of the respective MOSCAP, biased at 5V, by a factor of 2. At this point further improvement in sensitivity will be limited by the number of radiation-generated holes within the oxide. Therefore, increasing the sensitivity further requires a thicker oxide which will allow for the creation of more radiation-generated holes, which can fill the excess traps.

FIG. 9 is an illustration of the radiation-induced shift in the threshold voltage parameter as a function of the oxide layer thickness in a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP, according to one embodiment of the present invention. If the oxide electric field is held constant, the sensitivity increases with the square of Oxide thickness (t_(ox) ²). However, if the oxide is unbiased then the sensitivity can no longer be assumed to be proportional to the square of the oxide thickness, because the sensitivity is now dominated by the intrinsic electric field of the pre-existing charged oxide defects and contact potential between the gate (Top conductive layer) and semiconductor (bottom conductive layer). The threshold voltage shift due to both charges decreases with a slightly less than a t_(ox) ² dependence. For oxides thinner than 20 nm, sensitivity drop-off (in terms of the density of radiation-generated oxide-trapped charges whose amount decreases with an even faster dependence on Oxide thickness) is much more severe than t_(ox) ² dependence. Thicker oxide results in larger voltage shift due to greater number of present oxide traps as well as the greater number of electron-hole pairs generated due to the increased volume available for the absorption of the incident radiation.

However, as the oxide thickness increases, so does the gate voltage required to maintain a constant electric field. The measured data in FIG. 10 (representing the C-V response curve for MOSCAPs with different oxide thickness values) shows an inverse relationship wherein the slope of the C-V response curve decreases as the oxide layer thickness is increased. FIG. 11 demonstrates the slope of the C-V response curves in FIG. 10 as a function of gate oxide thickness at their respective inflection points. It is observed that the slope increases significantly for thinner oxides. Determining the radiation-induced capacitance response sensitivity of the MOSCAPs with different oxide thickness values requires multiplying the voltage shift values for the corresponding MOSCAPs from FIG. 9 by the inflection slope of the corresponding C-V response curves from FIG. 11 (rate of change capacitance with respect to voltage). FIG. 12 illustrates the resulting radiation-induced capacitance response sensitivity of the MOSCAP sensors with increasing oxide layer thickness parameters ranging from 200 nm to 1240 nm. According to the measurements shown in FIG. 12, the largest capacitance shift is actually obtained with thinnest oxide.

FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary solid-state dosimeter system 1300, in accordance to one embodiment of the present invention. The solid-state dosimeter system 1300 may comprise a front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 comprising of one or more on-board radiation sensing and signal processing elements and a far-end processing/reporting unit or a base station 1302. The front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 may comprise one or more capacitive sensing elements 1303 such as, for example, one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1304. The front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 may also comprise a capacitive readout IC 1306 coupled to the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1304 for real-time measurement and digitization of the radiation—induced capacitance response in one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1304. In some embodiments the front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 may further comprise a microprocessor/wireless transceiver integrating circuit (IC) 1308 for storage, processing and wireless transmission of the digital capacitance values provided by the capacitive readout IC 1306. The microprocessor/wireless transceiver IC 1308 may include a Bluetooth® controller (antenna transceiver) 1310 for establishing a Bluetooth® link to the far-end processing/reporting unit or base station 1302 to thereby enable automatic uploading of the radiation dose information, when the front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 is in proximity of the base station 1302. The front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 may further comprise additional functionality such as, for example, temperature sensing, for providing the necessary temperature measurements that may be used to compensate for the temperature induced drift in the measurement of the radiation-induced capacitance response in one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs and a motion detection operation for wake-up functionality and for verifying user presence during radiation exposure.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the solid-state dosimeter system includes a wake on motion capability where the solid-state dosimeter system goes into an ultra-low-power mode and wakes up when the motion exceeds a predetermined threshold.

In the exemplary solid-state dosimeter system 1300, temperature sensing functionality may be provided by a resistive temperature detector (RTD) 1314. RTD element 1314 exhibits a predictable change in resistance as the temperature changes, therefore temperature sensing may be implemented by correlating the resistance of the RTD element 1314 with the operating temperature of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1304.

In the exemplary solid-state dosimeter system 1300, motion detection functionality may be provided by an accelerometer 1316. In one embodiment of the present invention the accelerometer 1316 may comprise a microscopic crystal structure that exhibits a piezoelectric effect such that when the crystal structure is stressed by accelerative forces, it generates a voltage. In another embodiment, accelerometer 1316 may sense changes in capacitance, for example, it may comprise two microstructures next to each other, having a certain capacitance between them. If an accelerative force moves one of the structures, then the capacitance between them will change. In such a case, the capacitive readout IC 1306 may be utilized to convert the capacitance change, detected across connection 1317, to a voltage value to thereby implement accelerometer functionality. This would be relevant in occupational dosimetry applications wherein the front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 of the solid-state dosimeter system 1300 may be implemented as a portable or wearable device. The data from the accelerometer 1316 may be used in conjunction with the radiation dose data from the capacitive readout IC 1306 and the microprocessor/wireless transceiver IC 1308 in order to indicate whether the front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 was carried by, worn by or attached to a user during radiation exposure. In select embodiments, the temperature and acceleration data may also be transmitted, for example, to the base station 1302 for further data processing, conditioning, interpretation or evaluation.

It is not the intention of the forgoing description or figures to place any restriction on the methodology utilized for generating the motion data that may be indicative of user operation during radiation exposure. As such, it should be noted that alternative means of generating motion data may be employed by the solid-state dosimeter system without departing from the scope of the present invention.

The far-end processing/reporting unit or the base station 1302 may comprise a wireless receiver 1322 and an application interface 1324. The wireless receiver 1322 may serve as a radio frequency (RF) signal interface for establishing a reliable wireless link with a RF transmitting element such as, for example, Bluetooth® low energy (BLE) controller or antenna transceiver 1310 that may be implemented on the front-end sensing/processing unit 1301, to thereby enable wireless exchange of information with the front-end sensing/processing unit 1301. The information received by the wireless receiver 1322 may then be processed by the application interface 1324 for user intended reporting and administration.

In select embodiments of the present invention, the relevant environmental data, such as, for example, the absorbed radiation dose, the ambient or sensor temperature data and the motion or acceleration related data, may be stored to a non-transient storage medium 1326 and/or displayed to a user on a display device 1328.

In accordance to one aspect of the present invention, select embodiments of the exemplary solid-state dosimeter system 1300, may comprise a front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 wherein the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1304 may be switchingly coupled to the capacitive readout IC 1306 across an active bias switching circuit 1330. The active bias switching circuit may be interchangeably referred to as the switching interface. The active bias switching circuit 1330 may alternate between a first switching state, which may comprise applying an external bias 1332, for enhancing the radiation-induced buildup of positive charge (holes) density at the Si/SiO₂ interface in the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1304, and a second switching state, which may comprise removing the external bias 1332 and connecting the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1304 to the capacitive readout IC 1306, with reversed polarity, for performing a measurement of the capacitance response (shift) induced in the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1304 as a result of the radiation-induced buildup of oxide-trapped hole density at the Si/SiO₂ interface. In accordance to one embodiment of the present invention, switching interface 1330 may alternate between first and second switching states statically in response to a pre-programmed user input. In accordance to another embodiment of the present invention the switching interface alternates between the first switching state and the second switching state dynamically in response to one or more internal system states and/or external environmental parameters.

Accordingly, application of a positive bias voltage result in increased oxide trapped hole buildup near the Si/SiO₂ interface in an irradiated MOSCAP device. The number of oxide trapped holes near the Si/SiO₂ interface yields a negative shift in threshold voltage which appears as an effective equivalent increase in the positive voltage drop across the MOSCAP. In order to exploit the superior sensitivity and measurement resolution associated with capacitance measurement and readout electronics, the measurable capacitance response resulting from the radiation-induced shift in the threshold voltage maybe used as MOSCAP output response. However, MOSCAP capacitance response, when measured in the inversion operating region, exhibits no measurable response to radiation as can be seen from the exemplary post-radiation and pre-radiation C-V response curves 1400, measured for a p-substrate implemented radiation-sensitive MOSCAP in FIG. 14.

On the other hand, the capacitance in the depletion region (specifically in the vicinity of the inflection point 1402 on the C-V response curve) changes significantly. Therefore, in order to optimize measurement resolution, it may be desirable to measure the capacitance of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP in the depletion region of operation preferably at or near the inflection point 1402. The optimal measurement region is marked with a solid line 1404 in FIG. 14.

In the case of the exemplary p-substrate implemented MOSCAP of FIG. 14, the application of a positive external bias to increase the rate and density of the radiation-induced hole build up near the Si/SiO₂ interface may place the MOSCAP in the inversion region 1401, as illustrated in FIG. 14. Measurement of the MOSCAP capacitance response induced by the radiation-induced charge buildup near Si/SiO₂ interface, post external bias application, may require shifting the operating point of the MOSCAP device into the depletion region prior to measuring the induced capacitance response.

Accordingly, In order to enable capacitance measurement within the optimal measurement region (depletion region) 1404, the voltage supply (Vdd) of the capacitive readout IC 1306 is chosen such that Vdd to ½(Vdd) voltage magnitude range falls within the depletion voltage range 1406 associated with the optimal measurement region (depletion region) 1402. In order to account for the negative polarity of the depletion voltage range 1406 in the optimal measurement region 1404, the measurement must be taken in a direction opposite to that of the bias application. The active bias switching circuit 1330 is configured accordingly to reverse the connection polarity of a p-substrate implemented radiation-sensitive MOSCAP between capacitance measurement and bias application such that biasing voltage is applied to the gate electrode of a p-substrate implemented radiation-sensitive MOSCAP while measurement is taken from the body (substrate) electrode of a p-substrate implemented radiation-sensitive MOSCAP.

The corresponding C-V trace 1500 associated with the measurement cycle is shown in FIG. 15. The depletion region, as shown on C-V trace 1500 is confined between the between the high-end voltage value 1502 and low-end voltage value 1504. The high-end voltage value 1502 corresponds approximately to the supply voltage (Vdd) of the capacitive readout IC 1306 and is selected as approximately 2.8 V in accordance to one embodiment of the present invention. The low-end voltage value 1504 corresponds to the threshold voltage (V_(th)) of the capacitive device (i.e., radiation-sensitive MOSCAP or reference capacitor) in accordance to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 16 illustrate the connectivity pattern 1600 established by the active bias switching circuit 1330 during the capacitance measurement and bias application cycles. The connectivity pattern 1600 is characterized by a switching configuration 1602 and 1604 established by controlling the state of switches 1606, 1608 and 1610. In the switching configuration 1602, switch 1606 and 1610 are open while switch 1608 is closed thereby grounding the top conducting layer (gate) 1612 of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP 1614 while connecting the bottom conducting layer (substrate/body) 1616 of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP 1614 to the positive terminal 1618 of the capacitive readout IC 1306. In the switching configuration 1604, switch 1608 is open while switch 1606 and 1610 are closed thereby connecting the top conducting layer (gate) 1612 of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP 1614 to the positive terminal 1620 of the external bias 1332 while grounding the bottom conducting layer 1616 of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP 1614 through the capacitive readout IC 1306. As illustrated in FIG. 16, the connection polarity during the capacitance measurement cycle as indicted by 1622 is opposite that of the bias application cycle as indicated by 1624.

FIG. 17 illustrates the connectivity profile 1700 between the active bias switching circuit 1702, one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1704, reference capacitor 1705 and the capacitive readout IC represented by an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), i.e., PCAP01 capacitance measurement IC 1706, interchangeably referred to as PCAP01 IC 1706. Active bias switching circuit 1702 comprises No-Connect ports 1708 that are left unconnected in one instance and tied to the ground terminal (GND) in another instance as illustrated in FIG. 17. Port 1709, designated for connection to a negative rail voltage, is also left unconnected according to the exemplary connectivity profile 1700. Furthermore, in the exemplary connectivity profile 1700, port connection 1710 and 1712 are connected to the external biasing source 1312. Input/output port 1714 is connected to common node 1716 formed by shorting together the conducting contacts 1717 of the top conducting layers 1718 of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1704. The bottom conducting layers 1720 of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1704 are connected to the capacitive measurement ports 1722 of the capacitive readout IC (PCAP01 IC) 1706. Input port 1724 of the active bias switching circuit 1702 is connected to a digital output 1726 coming from microprocessor/wireless transceiver IC 1308.

A select embodiment of the earlier described capacitive readout IC 1306 is illustrated in FIG. 18. Here, an application of the aforementioned capacitive readout IC 1306 is employed as a PCAP01 IC 1800. PCAP01 IC 1800 comprises capacitive measurement ports 1722 for connection to the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1704, capacitive output port 1802 for outputting a value for the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1704, along with a temperature value that is outputted along with the capacitance data, port connection 1804 for connecting a reference capacitor 1705, general purpose input/output ports 1808, temperature measurement ports 1809 and 1810 for connecting an external resistive temperature sensor 1811, port connection 1814 for connecting an external discharge resistor 1815 and port connection 1817 for connecting an external temperature measurement reference sensor 1819, port connection 1820 for connecting, for example, to a bypass capacitor in order to protect the circuit against transient voltage fluctuations. Supply voltage (Vdd) connectivity is established through port connection 1822, with a bypass path to the ground provided by a bypass capacitor 1824, and ground connectivity is provided through port connection 1826. In the PCAP01 IC 1800 temperature measurement, similar to the capacitance measurement, is discharge time based. Therefore, an external capacitor 1828 may be connected to the external resistive temperature sensor 1811 as shown in FIG. 18.

As stated above, the capacitance measurement method utilized by the PCAP01 IC 1800 is based on the measurement of the resistor-capacitor (RC) discharge time. The capacitors are represented by the radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1704 connected to ports 1722 in PCAP01 IC 1800. The resistors are represented by a set of four selectable internal discharge resistors 1902 with respective resistance values, for example, ranging from 10 kΩ to 180 kΩ, as illustrated by the exemplary capacitance measurement schematic 1900, in FIG. 19. The radiation-sensitive MOSCAP 1904, connected to the capacitive measurement port 1905, is charged to the supply voltage (Vdd) 1906 through port connection 1822, and subsequently discharged into a discharge resistor selected from the set of four selectable internal discharge resistors 1902. The radiation-sensitive MOSCAP 1904 may also be discharged into an external discharge resistor 1815 connected to port 1814. Since the set of four selectable internal discharge resistors 1902 and the external discharge resistor 1815 (in cases where an external discharge resistor functionality is supported) are of known values, based on the discharge time of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP 1904 relative to the dis-charge time measured for the reference capacitor 1705 (which has a known capacitance value), radiation-induced capacitance response of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP 1904 may be extracted. The measured discharge time value 1907 may be digitized with a Time-to-Digital Converter (TDC) 1908 to produce a digital output 1910 from which the radiation dose absorbed by the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP 1904 may be extracted.

As previously described, the RC discharge time measurement comprises measurement of the time it takes for the voltage across a capacitive device (which may comprise a radiation-sensitive MOSCAP or a reference capacitor), that has been charged initially to, for example, the supply voltage (Vdd), to decrease from the Vdd level to a fraction of its initial value (corresponding to approximately one time constant). This is further demonstrated by the signal trace 2001 in the exemplary waveform illustration 2000 of FIG. 20. In FIG. 20, a capacitive device associated with the signal trace 2002 is discharged from its initial Vdd voltage level to a voltage level 2003, which corresponds to the threshold voltage (V_(th)) of the capacitive device, during the discharge time 2004. The total time between two consecutive discharge cycles may be defined as the cycle time. As illustrated by the signal trace 2002, a cycle time 2005, which may be set by the user, is the time interval between discharge cycles 2006 and 2008. In preferred embodiments of the present invention the cycle time 2005 may be equal to or greater than the sum of the discharge time 2004 and the charge time 2010. In the exemplary signal trace 2002, the cycle time 2005 is greater than the sum of the discharge time 2004 and charge time 2010 by an over-head time interval 2012. In select embodiments of the present invention user-defined cycle time is selected to yield a positive over-head time interval, thus ensuring a discharge time measurement that is based on full discharge and charge cycles.

In accordance to one embodiment of the present invention, an exemplary measurement block represented by the signal trace 2016 in FIG. 20, comprises RC discharge time measurements for each capacitive element in a prescribed sequence associated with one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 1704 and the reference capacitor 1705. The PCAP01 measured discharge time correspond to a period of approximately one time constant (τ). Considering that the ratio of the reference capacitance (C_(Ref)) and the sensor (radiation-sensitive MOSCAP) capacitance (C_(Sens)) is equal to their discharge time ratio (discharge time ratio of reference capacitor and radiation-sensitive MOSCAP) or equivalently the ratio of the respective time constants (as shown by equation 1), the capacitance value of the sensor (radiation-sensitive MOSCAP) can be represented by the expression in equation 2.

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{\tau_{Sens}}{\tau_{Ref}} = \frac{C_{Sens}}{C_{Ref}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1} \right) \\ {C_{Sens} = {\frac{\tau_{Sens}}{\tau_{Ref}}C_{Ref}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 2} \right) \end{matrix}$

In order to reduce measurement noise and enhance measurement resolution of the radiation-induced capacitance response, in accordance to one embodiment of the present invention, a prescribed number of discharge time measurement samples, for both the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs and the reference capacitor are obtained. The measured discharge time values, for both the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs and the reference capacitor, are averaged over a prescribed number of measurement samples and the averaged values are used to calculate the capacitance of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs according to equation 2, to thereby generate a low noise readout of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs. The signal to Noise (SNR) associated with the measured discharge time, hence the capacitance response, of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs, is proportional to the square root of the prescribed number of samples, hence averaging over a greater number of samples may reduce measurement noise and enhance the measurement precision and resolution of the absorbed radiation dose in the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs.

Accordingly, by utilizing a MOSCAP to thereby produce a radiation-induced capacitance response with enhanced sensitivity by way of external biasing and parametric optimization of MOSCAP fabrication and design and furthermore by increasing the capacitance measurement precision (hence, the radiation measurement precision) by ensuring capacitance measurement in MOSCAP depletion region of operation (at or around the inflection point) and by implementing a measurement algorithm that utilizes averaging of measured capacitance values over a prescribed number of samples to reduce the measurement noise and enhance the measurement Signal-to-Noise (SNR) ratio, in accordance to the exemplary procedure and methodology described above, a high sensitivity, high resolution measurement of received radiation dose based on measurement of MOSCAP capacitance may be obtained. In accordance to one embodiment of the present invention, a twenty fold increase in the relative measurement's precision, compared to C-V meter based capacitance measurements, is achieved with the disclosed capacitance measurement methodology.

In accordance to one embodiment of the present invention, the measurement of radiation-induced capacitance response, in the inversion and the depletion operating regions, for four MOSCAPs with different insulating layer composition, is performed by PCAP01 IC 1800 and illustrated in FIGS. 21 through 25. The incident radiation dose that is distinguishable in the profile of the MOSCAP capacitance response maybe identified in the following measurements.

FIG. 21 illustrate the significance of MOSCAP operation region in determining its radiation-induced capacitance response. The measurement results 2100 represents a capacitance time-trace 2102 for an exemplary MOSCAP with a Dibenzoylmethane-based (DBM-Al-09) insulating layer operating in the depletion region. Also represented in the measurement results 2100 is a capacitance time-trace 2104 corresponding to an exemplary MOSCAP with an Epoxy insulating layer operating in the inversion region. MOSCAP devices with DBA-Al-09 and Epoxy insulating layer, operating in depletion and inversion regions respectively, are irradiated with three doses of 5000 mRad at 10 minutes intervals corresponding to irradiation events 2104, 2106 and 2108. For the MOSCAP capacitance time-trace 2102, measured in the depletion region, the induced response to the first irradiation event 2104 is represented by waveform segment 2110 and 2112, the induced response to the second radiation event 2106 is represented by waveform segments 2114 and 2116 and the induced response to the third irradiation event is represented by waveform segments 2118 and 2120. The radiation-induced capacitance response for the MOSCAP operating in the depletion region exhibits a deterministic behavior, exemplified by a linear reduction 2110, 2114, 2118 to a steady constant value 2112, 2116 and 2120 that exhibit a linearly proportional relationship to the received radiation dose.

For the MOSCAP Capacitance time-trace 2104, measured in the inversion region, the induced response to the first irradiation event 2104 is represented by waveform segment 2122 and 2124, the induced response to the second irradiation event 2106 is represented by waveform segments 2126 and 2128 and the induced response to the third irradiation event is represented by waveform segments 2130 and 2132. The radiation-induced capacitance response for the MOSCAP operating in the inversion region exhibits a non-deterministic fluctuation 2122, 2126 and 2130 followed by a transition to a non-uniform value 2124, 2128 and 2132 during the waiting period that exhibits no identifiable relationship with the received radiation dose. The time dependence of the waveform segments 2110, 2114 and 2118 in capacitance time-trace 2102 is associated with the slow, stochastic transport of radiation-induced holes towards the Si/SiO₂ interface of the MOSCAP. As illustrated in FIG. 21, the radiation-induced capacitance time-trace 2102, measured in the depletion region, is clearly able to resolve 5000 mRad dose levels.

In waveform plots 2200 of FIG. 22, waveforms 2202, 2204 and 2206 represent time-trace of capacitance response to radiation exposure for different MOSCAPs operating in Inversion and Depletion modes with the corresponding radiation exposure profile represented by the total dose time trace 2208. The radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms 2202 and 2204 are measured for MOSCAPs, operating in inversion, with an Epoxy 2 and a DBA-Al-09 based insulating layers respectively. The waveform 2206 represents two overlapped radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms measured for MOSCAPs, operating in depletion, with an Epoxy 3 and a DBA-Al-09 based insulating layers respectively. The radiation exposure profile, represented by the total dose time-trace 2208, is characterized by exposure events 2210, 2212, 2014 corresponding to three doses of 1000 mRad, delivered at approximately 10 minutes intervals, and exposure events 2216, 2218, 2220, 2222, 2224 corresponding to five doses of 100 mRad, delivered at approximately 4 minutes intervals.

As illustrated in FIG. 22 the radiation-induced MOSCAP capacitance, when measured in depletion, (i.e., waveform 2206) is a predictable function of the received radiation dose and is reproducible across different MOSCAPs under similar operating conditions. Measurement of radiation-induced capacitance for MOSCAPs operating in depletion, produce a linear and predictable radiation response that may be calibrated and used as a reliable measure of received radiation dose. This is illustrated by the waveform 2206 representing two overlapped radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms measured for an Epoxy 3 and DBA-Al-09 based MOSCAPs operating in depletion. According to waveform 2206 MOSCAP capacitance response to radiation measured in depletion readily resolve 1000 mrad dose levels. 100 mrad dose levels are also resolvable in spectrum. As further illustrated by the waveform plot 2200, MOSCAP Capacitance response measured in inversion, namely waveforms 2202 and 2204, exhibit no predictable relation with received radiation dose.

In waveform plots 2300 of FIG. 23, waveforms 2302, 2304, 2306 and 2308 represent time-trace of MOSCAP capacitance in response to radiation exposure for different MOSCAPs operating in Inversion and Depletion modes with the corresponding radiation exposure profile represented by the total dose time trace 2310. The radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms 2302 is measured for a MOSCAP, operating in inversion, with an Epoxy 2 based insulating layer. The radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms 2304 is measured for a MOSCAP, operating in depletion, with a DBM-Al-09 based insulating layer. The radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms 2306 is measured for a MOSCAP, operating in depletion, with an Epoxy 3 based insulating layer. The radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms 2308 is measured for a MOSCAP, operating in inversion, with an DBM-Al-06 based insulating layer. The radiation exposure profile, represented by the total dose time-trace 2310, is characterized by exposure events 2312, 2314 and 2316 corresponding to three doses of 100 mRad, delivered at approximately 20 minutes intervals. It is again observed that the measurement of radiation-induced capacitance for MOSCAPs operating in depletion, produce a linear and predictable radiation response that may be calibrated and used as a reliable measure of received radiation dose. This is illustrated by the waveforms 2304 and 2306 representing the radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms measured for an Epoxy 3 and DBA-Al-09 based MOSCAPs operating in depletion. As illustrated by waveforms 2302 and 2308 the inversion measured capacitance response is unpredictable relative to the received radiation dose. The radiation-induced capacitance response in the case of DBM-Al-06 MOSCAP continuously increases while, in the case of the Epoxy 2 MOSCAP it continuously decreases with no apparent relationship to the received radiation dose.

In waveform plots 2400 of FIG. 24, waveforms 2402, 2404, 2406 and 2408 represent time-trace of MOSCAP capacitance in response to radiation exposure for different MOSCAPs operating in Inversion and Depletion modes with the corresponding radiation exposure profile represented by the total dose time-trace 2410. The radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms 2402 is measured for a MOSCAP with an Epoxy 2 based insulating layer, operating in inversion, The radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms 2404 is measured for a MOSCAP with a DBM-Al-09 based insulating layer operating in depletion. The radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms 2306 is measured for a MOSCAP, with an Epoxy 3 based insulating layer operating in depletion. The radiation-induced capacitance response waveforms 2408 is measured for a MOSCAP with an DBM-Al-06 based insulating layer operating in inversion. The radiation exposure profile, represented by the total dose time-trace 2410, is characterized by exposure events 2412, 2414 and 2416, 2418, 2420 corresponding to four doses of 50 mRad, delivered at approximately 10, 27, 12 and 11 minutes intervals. The two MOSCAPs in depletion, 2404 and 2406, once again exhibit matched capacitance response to received radiation dose. 50 mRad dose level resolvable in spectrum. 10 mrad dose level resolvable after statistical compensation.

A scope screen capture 2500 illustrating a single charge discharge cycle for a MOSCPAP connected to PCAP 01 is shown in FIG. 25. Cursor 2502 and 2504 denote voltage value at start (Vdd) and end (Vth) of one discharge cycle and respectively correspond to values 2.76 V and 940 mV. Cursor 2506 and 2508 denote the time values at the start and end of one discharge cycle and respectively correspond to values 34.8 μs and 24.4 μs. The single charge discharge cycle illustrated in the scope screen capture 2500 corresponds to a voltage change of 1.82 V in a discharge time of 10.4 μs.

Histogram 2600 in FIG. 26 illustrates the difference between successive capacitance measurements of PCAP 01 IC. It is observed that change between measurements is Gaussian and the approximately 95% of the difference between successive measurements are within 500 aF.

A select embodiment of the earlier described microprocessor/wireless transceiver IC 1308 is illustrated in FIG. 27. Here, an application of the aforementioned microprocessor/wireless transceiver IC 1308 is employed as a Nordic™ nRF51422 SoC IC 2100. Nordic™ nRF51422 SoC IC 2100 comprises a set of digital input/output (I/O) ports 2702, a set of ports 2704 that can support both digital Input/output (I/O) and analog input function, ground connectivity ports 27105, Vdd power supply connectivity ports 2706, analog power supply connectivity ports 2708 for RF functionality, output power supply port 2712 for providing supply voltage for on-chip RF power amplification, analog input ports 2714 and 2716 for high and low frequency reference clock input connectivity, analog output port 2718 and 2720 for high and low frequency reference clock output connectivity, RF ports 2722, 2724 for differential transmit and receive (TX and RX) connectivity to an on-board antenna transceiver 2726 through an antenna matching circuitry 2728. The outgoing RF signal 2730 on port 2732 of the antenna matching circuitry 2728 is sent to the on-board antenna transceiver 2726 for wireless transmission to a local/remote system.

In one embodiment, a Nordic™ 5310 Bluetooth® 4.0 SoftDevice™ (protocol stack) is implemented in conjunction with radio hardware such as, for example, the antenna transceiver 1310 for providing wireless connectivity and communication functionality between the front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 and the far-end processing/reporting unit or base station 1302.

In one embodiment, the microprocessor/wireless transceiver IC 1308 may be used to process and average some of the data from the capacitive readout IC 1306, and to store the averaged value. In the disclosed embodiment, when a user is close to a far-end processing/reporting unit or base station 1302, a Bluetooth® link, using the Nordic™ 5310 Bluetooth® 4.0 protocol stack is established between the front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 and the base station 1302 and the generated environmental sensing data (i.e., absorbed radiation dose and temperature and acceleration related data) are uploaded to the base station 1302. The number of readings taken by the front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 per day and the number of readings transmitted to the base station 1302 are programmable. These are application-dependent with the primary tradeoff of frequent sampling being the relatively-large power consumption of the wireless transmission compared to the rest of the system.

FIG. 28 represents a CAD image of the front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 of the solid-state dosimeter system 1300, in accordance to one embodiment of the present invention. The front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 is implemented on an exemplary double-sided Printed Circuit Board (PCB) 2800, having a front side 2801 and a back side 2802. The exemplary PCB 2800 comprises: one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs sensors 2804 for producing a capacitance response in proportion to the absorbed radiation dose; a capacitive readout IC, represented by the PCAP 01 IC 2806, for high-resolution real-time electronic measurement and digitization of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAP sensors 2804; an active bias switching circuit 2808 for alternately coupling the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 2804 to a biasing source and to the PCAP01 IC 2806; a microprocessor/wireless transceiver IC, represented by a Nordic™ nRf 51422 IC 2810, for processing, storage and wireless transmission of measured environmental data (i.e., radiation dose, temperature and acceleration) with additional real-estate designated for peripheral modules such as temperature sensor and accelerometer, in accordance to one embodiment of the present invention. In one embodiment, the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP sensors are packaged in TO-46 enclosures. The capacitance voltage curves of the sensors are measured to ensure proper operation and inflection voltage. In one embodiment of the present invention all components and sensors are populated on a PCB of about 20 mm×50 mm. In accordance to one embodiment of the present invention, the on-board microprocessor/transceiver IC such as, for example, the Nordic™ nRf 51422 2810, may be responsible for the storage, processing and wireless transmission to a local/remote base station of the environmental data produced by one or more on-board sensors such as, for example, the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs 2804 and electronically measured and represented by an on-board capacitive readout IC such as, for example, the PCAP01 IC 2806. The firmware may be flashed to the microprocessor with, for example, read rates and data storage information.

As discussed earlier above with respect to FIG. 13, disclosed embodiments for occupational dosimetry applications may include front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 of solid-state dosimeter system 1300 implemented as a portable or wearable device. Exemplary applications of wearable devices are illustrated in FIG. 29. Thus, in one embodiment, the disclosed front-end sensing/processing unit 1301 of solid-state dosimeter system 1300 is implemented within wearable device 2902 shown as a badge 2904 affixed to a user's garment 2906. In other embodiments, wearable device 2902 may be implemented and configured to be worn by a user 2908, for example, at or around various extremities such as the arm 2910, the waist 2912, the neck 2914, the wrist 2916, the leg 2918, ankle 2920 and/or head 2922. Thus, disclosed embodiments provide that the wearable device may be mounted, fastened or attached to a user or any part of a user's clothing, or incorporated into items of clothing and accessories which may be worn on the body of a user. Wearable device 2902 may include wearable technology, wearables, fashionable technology, tech togs, fashion electronics, clothing and accessories, such as badges, watches, and jewelry incorporating computer and advanced electronic technologies.

The system, as described in the present technique or any of its components, may be embodied in the form of a computer system. Typical examples of a computer system include a general-purpose computer, a programmed micro-processor, a micro-controller, a peripheral integrated circuit element, and other devices or arrangements of devices that are capable of implementing the steps that constitute the method of the present technique.

The computer system comprises a computer, an input device, a display unit and/or the Internet. The computer further comprises a microprocessor. The microprocessor is connected to a communication bus. The computer also includes a memory. The memory may include Random Access Memory (RAM) and Read Only Memory (ROM). The computer system further comprises a storage device. The storage device can be a hard disk drive or a removable storage drive such as a floppy disk drive, optical disk drive, etc. The storage device can also be other similar means for loading computer programs or other instructions into the computer system. The computer system also includes a communication unit. The communication unit allows the computer to connect to other databases and the Internet through an I/O interface. The communication unit allows the transfer as well as reception of data from other databases. The communication unit may include a modem, an Ethernet card, or any similar device which enables the computer system to connect to databases and networks such as LAN, MAN, WAN and the Internet. The computer system facilitates inputs from a user through input device, accessible to the system through I/O interface.

The computer system executes a set of instructions that are stored in one or more storage elements, in order to process input data. The storage elements may also hold data or other information as desired. The storage element may be in the form of an information source or a physical memory element present in the processing machine.

The set of instructions may include various commands that instruct the processing machine to perform specific tasks such as the steps that constitute the method of the present technique. The set of instructions may be in the form of a software program. Further, the software may be in the form of a collection of separate programs, a program module with a larger program or a portion of a program module, as in the present technique. The software may also include modular programming in the form of object-oriented programming. The processing of input data by the processing machine may be in response to user commands, results of previous processing or a request made by another processing machine.

Although in the embodiments of the present invention described above, a PCAP01 is the application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) used for capacitance measurement, in other embodiments of the present invention other types of ASICs may be used such as a PCAP04.

Having described the many embodiments of the present invention in detail, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the invention defined in the appended claims. Furthermore, it should be appreciated that all examples in the present disclosure, while illustrating many embodiments of the invention, are provided as non-limiting examples and are, therefore, not to be taken as limiting the various aspects so illustrated. 

1. An apparatus comprising: a switching interface, wherein the switching interface alternates between a first switching state and a second switching state, wherein in the first switching state, a radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitor (MOSCAP) is coupled to a biasing source, wherein in the second switching state, the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP is coupled with reversed polarity relative to the first switching state to a capacitive readout circuit to thereby allow for high-resolution real-time electronic measurement of a radiation-induced capacitance response.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the switching interface alternates between the first switching state and the second switching state dynamically in response to a state of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP.
 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the switching interface alternates between the first switching state and the second switching state statically in response to a pre-programmed user input.
 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the switching interface alternates between the first switching state and the second switching state dynamically in response to one or more internal system states and/or external environmental parameters.
 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein during the second switching state a voltage across a depletion region of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP remains between a bias voltage provided by the external biasing source and a threshold voltage of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP.
 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first switching state enhances sensitivity of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP.
 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the sensitivity is enhanced by ensuring operation in an inversion operation region of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP.
 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second switching state enhances measurement resolution of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP.
 9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the second switching state enhances measurement by ensuring measurement in a depletion region of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP.
 10. An apparatus comprising: one or more radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitors (MOSCAPs) configured to generate a radiation-induced capacitance response; an external biasing source configured to increase sensitivity of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs; a capacitive readout circuit configured for high-resolution, real-time electronic measurement of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs; and a switching interface configured to alternate between a first switching state and a second switching state, wherein in the first switching state, a radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitor (MOSCAP) is coupled to an external biasing source, wherein the second switching state enhances measurement by ensuring measurement in a depletion region of the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP.
 11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein in the second switching state, the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP is coupled with reversed polarity relative to the first switching state to a capacitive readout circuit to thereby allow for high-resolution real-time electronic measurement of the radiation-induced capacitance response.
 12. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein an output of the capacitive readout circuit comprises a discharge time ratio of reference capacitor and radiation-sensitive MOSCAP for the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs.
 13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the output of the capacitive readout circuit comprises a discharge time ratio of a reference capacitor and the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs averaged over a prescribed number of samples to thereby generate a low noise readout of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs.
 14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein a measurement resolution for the capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs is improved by increasing the prescribed number of samples.
 15. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein a Signal-to-Noise (SNR) ratio associated with a measured capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs is proportional to a square root of the prescribed number of samples.
 16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein a measurement precision is 20 times greater than a measurement precision obtained with a C-V meter.
 17. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the capacitive readout circuit comprises an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) configured for measurement of the capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs.
 18. An apparatus comprising: one or more radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitors (MOSCAPs) configured to generate a radiation-induced capacitance response; a biasing source configured to increase the sensitivity of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs; a capacitive readout circuit configured for high-resolution, real-time electronic measurement of the radiation-induced capacitance response of the one or more radiation-sensitive MOSCAPs; and a switching interface configured to alternate between a first switching state and a second switching state, wherein in the first switching state, a radiation-sensitive metal oxide semiconductor capacitor (MOSCAP) is coupled to an external biasing source, wherein in the second switching state, the radiation-sensitive MOSCAP is coupled with reversed polarity relative to the first switching state to a capacitive readout circuit to thereby allow for high-resolution real-time electronic measurement of the radiation-induced capacitance response; and a microprocessor/wireless transceiver integrated-circuit (IC) for processing, storage and transmission of an output of the capacitive readout circuit to a base station for further signal processing and reporting.
 19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the transmission occurs over a wireless link established to the base station when the microprocessor/wireless transceiver IC is in a vicinity of the base station.
 20. The apparatus of claim 18, further comprising a temperature sensing element for compensating temperature of the radiation-induced capacitance response.
 21. The apparatus of claim 18, further comprising an accelerometer.
 22. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the accelerometer is configured to implement a wake-up function.
 23. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the accelerometer is configured within a wearable device.
 24. The apparatus of claim 23, wherein an output of the accelerometer indicates whether the device is worn by a user during radiation exposure.
 25. The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the apparatus is configured so that the apparatus goes into an ultra-low-power mode and wakes up when motion of the apparatus exceeds a predetermined threshold. 